- NOTE: This blogpost was first posted on my Facebook site.
South African terrorist, war criminal and black racist Nelson Mandela’s handwritten essay explains how the Marxists (meaning: socialists and communists who adhere to the gospel of Karl Marx) define the term “communist” or “communism”. Remember that Marxism (with its socialist and communist doctrines) is just one of the many types of Socialism or Statism or Collectivism.
Mandela’s writing explains why self-identified Filipino socialist Teddy Casino does not consider himself a communist and why the leftards have an utterly distorted concept of Definition.
Rep. Teddy Casino once said: “I am not a communist. I am not part of the armed struggle nor do I espouse it. I am an activist, a nationalist and a democrat committed to the struggle for social reform.”
This Filipino leftist politician merely identified himself as “an activist, a nationalist and a democrat committed to the struggle for social reform.”
But how can a self-confessed, self-identified Marxist reject– or not advocate communism– if he actually embraces the gospel and teachings of Karl Marx? Very clearly modern-day Marxist have a dualist, contradictory interpretation of Marxism.
In his essay entitled “How to be a Good Communist”, Mandela said: “A Communist is a member of the Communist Party who understands and accepts the theory and practice of Marxism-Leninism as explained by Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin , and who subjects himself to the discipline of the Party.”
The goal of Communism is a classless society based on the principle: from each according to his ability and to each according to his needs. The aim is to change the present world into a Communist world where there will be no exploiters and no exploited, no oppressor and oppressed, no rich and no poor. Communists fight for a world where there will be no unemployment, no poverty and starvation, disease and ignorance. In such a world there will be no capitalists, no imperialists, no fascists. There will be neither colonies nor wars.
In our own country, the struggles of the oppressed people are guided by the South African Communist Party and inspired by its policies. The aim of the S.A.C.P. is to defeat the Nationalist government and to free the people of South Africa from the evils of racial discrimination and exploitation and to build a classless or socialist society in which the land, the mines, the mills…
He further said:
Communists everywhere fight to destroy capitalist society and to replace it with Socialism, where the masses of the common people, irrespective of race or colour, will live in complete equality, freedom and happiness. They seek to revolutionise society and are thus called revolutionaries. Those who support capitalism with its class divisions and other evils and who oppose our just struggles to end oppression are called counter revolutionaries.
Did Mandela’s ultra-left African National Congress achieve the communist goal?
Yes, they managed to destroy some of the aspects of capitalism, yet as a result, they brought South Africa down with their socialist policies. Today, South Africa is known as the crime and rape capital of the world.
In fact, Helen Suzman, the lone anti-apartheid voice in the South African parliament, claimed that South African blacks were better off under apartheid. This is not to defend apartheid, which was an evil policy implemented by the White supremacist politicians in the country, but in terms of safety, security and economic wealth, black political analysts like Walter Williams suggested that blacks were more secure under colonialism.
Mandela’s definition of “communism”, which is widely shared by modern-day communist/socialist ‘intellectuals’, means that in the Philippines, one must acquire Communist Party of the Philippines membership to be a card-carrying communist. That sounds more like a country club.
Mandela’s very crude definition also proves that communism, to modern-day commies, is nothing but an exclusive, elitist country club of– by– for the brain damaged Marxists.
It means that “Communism” is technically not an ideology– ergo, NOT an “ism”– but a privilege membership given only to the high priests and priestesses of Marxism. Let’s remove the “ism” from the term “communism” then.
To me, a “communist” is anyone who believes or adheres to communism or gospel/teachings of communism.
Yet this is how Marx defined communism:
“The Communists are distinguished from the other working-class parties by this only: 1. In the national struggles of the proletarians of the different countries, they point out and bring to the front the common interests of the entire proletariat, independently of all nationality. 2. In the various stages of development which the struggle of the working class against the bourgeoisie has to pass through, they always and everywhere represent the interests of the movement as a whole.
“The Communists, therefore, are on the one hand, practically, the most advanced and resolute section of the working-class parties of every country, that section which pushes forward all others; on the other hand, theoretically, they have over the great mass of the proletariat the advantage of clearly understanding the line of march, the conditions, and the ultimate general results of the proletarian movement.
“The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat.”
- In the youtube video below, Mandela’s long-time communist comrade in the ANC and the SACP and current president of South Africa, Jacob Zuma, sings “Kill the Boer” (translation: “kill the white farmer”). The thing is, these commie Black Supremacists do not just seek to carryout an anti-White genocide; they’re also determined to include people of other races or ethnicity, such as Indians, Chinese and Asians, in their racially inspired communist agenda.